Re: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Edmon and Rafik. 

Chuck


________________________________

From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
To: Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
ck@nic.museum <ck@nic.museum> 
Sent: Thu May 13 06:38:09 2010
Subject: Re: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG 


Hi,

I accept it as Friendlt amendment too,

Rafik


2010/5/13 Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



        Yes. Friendly amendment accepted.  Thanks for the edit Cary.
        Edmon
        


        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
        > Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        
        > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:57 AM
        > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        > Cc: ck@nic.museum
        
        > Subject: FW: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG
        >
        >
        > On behalf of the RySG and in particular Cary Karp, I would like to 
propose a
        > friendly amendment to the Motion Edmon made for the IDNG drafting 
team.
        >
        > Edmon - Will you accept this as a friendly amendment?
        >
        > Chuck
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: GNSO Registry Constituency Planning [mailto:REGYCON-
        > L@NIC.MUSEUM] On Behalf Of Cary Karp
        > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:05 AM
        > To: REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM
        > Subject: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG
        >
        > > Here is a motion submitted by Edmon to the Council list from the 
IDNG WG.
        > > Action on this motion is scheduled for 20 May.
        >
        > The passage,
        >
        > "... it is possible that an applicant could apply for both a
        > Letter-Digit-Hyphen (LDH) gTLD in ASCII and a corresponding
        > Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) gTLD that could be deemed to be
        > similar ..."
        >
        > contains a significant error. Labels that conform to the host name 
rule
        > are normally referred to as LDH labels. TLD labels do not designate
        > hosts and are subject to the further restriction of being alphabetic
        > only; they are not LDH, they are L, but that abbreviation is not used.
        >
        > Since A-labels (the form of an IDN that is actually entered into the
        > DNS) contain both hyphens and digits, they are not currently legal TLD
        > labels. This is regulated in RFC 1123, which is currently being 
revised
        > to permit A-labels in the root zone. The revision is very carefully
        > worded to restrict permissible A-labels to those that decode to
        > non-ASCII strings which are equivalent to "L-only" in the previous 
frame
        > of reference. The notions of D and H are deliberately not being
        > internationalized in this process.
        >
        > Here's the relevant draft:
        >
        >         http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-liman-tld-names-02.txt
        >
        > I therefore suggest something along the lines of,
        >
        > "... it is possible that an applicant could apply for both a gTLD 
with a
        > conventional ASCII label and a corresponding internationalized gTLD 
(IDN
        > gTLD) that could be deemed to be similar ..."
        >
        > /Cary
        
        > No virus found in this incoming message.
        > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
        > Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2860 - Release Date: 
05/13/10 14:26:00