Re: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I accept it as Friendlt amendment too,

Rafik

2010/5/13 Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Yes. Friendly amendment accepted.  Thanks for the edit Cary.
> Edmon
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:57 AM
> > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: ck@nic.museum
> > Subject: FW: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG
> >
> >
> > On behalf of the RySG and in particular Cary Karp, I would like to
> propose a
> > friendly amendment to the Motion Edmon made for the IDNG drafting team.
> >
> > Edmon - Will you accept this as a friendly amendment?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: GNSO Registry Constituency Planning [mailto:REGYCON-
> > L@NIC.MUSEUM] On Behalf Of Cary Karp
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:05 AM
> > To: REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM
> > Subject: Re: [REGYCON] FW: [council] Motion from IDNG
> >
> > > Here is a motion submitted by Edmon to the Council list from the IDNG
> WG.
> > > Action on this motion is scheduled for 20 May.
> >
> > The passage,
> >
> > "... it is possible that an applicant could apply for both a
> > Letter-Digit-Hyphen (LDH) gTLD in ASCII and a corresponding
> > Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) gTLD that could be deemed to be
> > similar ..."
> >
> > contains a significant error. Labels that conform to the host name rule
> > are normally referred to as LDH labels. TLD labels do not designate
> > hosts and are subject to the further restriction of being alphabetic
> > only; they are not LDH, they are L, but that abbreviation is not used.
> >
> > Since A-labels (the form of an IDN that is actually entered into the
> > DNS) contain both hyphens and digits, they are not currently legal TLD
> > labels. This is regulated in RFC 1123, which is currently being revised
> > to permit A-labels in the root zone. The revision is very carefully
> > worded to restrict permissible A-labels to those that decode to
> > non-ASCII strings which are equivalent to "L-only" in the previous frame
> > of reference. The notions of D and H are deliberately not being
> > internationalized in this process.
> >
> > Here's the relevant draft:
> >
> >         http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-liman-tld-names-02.txt
> >
> > I therefore suggest something along the lines of,
> >
> > "... it is possible that an applicant could apply for both a gTLD with a
> > conventional ASCII label and a corresponding internationalized gTLD (IDN
> > gTLD) that could be deemed to be similar ..."
> >
> > /Cary
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2860 - Release Date: 05/13/10
> 14:26:00
>
>
>