<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Motion on AOC review teams etc.
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Motion on AOC review teams etc.
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:54:50 +0200
- Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcryFVzU8QKPHeVFSIm+xAR/e16gLg==
- Thread-topic: Motion on AOC review teams etc.
Dear council colleagues,
I'd like to enter the following:
Motion to approve the GNSO Council's expectations about size and
composition of the Review Teams 'Security Stability and Resilience of
the DNS' and 'Whois policy' and to approve the GNSO Council's response
to the draft proposal on the call for volunteers representing SO/ACs for
the Affirmation reviews 'Security Stability and Resilience of the DNS'
and 'Whois policy'
Whereas:
* On 22 April 2010, the chair of the GAC was requesting comment
from the GNSO regarding the size and composition of the Review Teams
'Security Stability and Resilience of the DNS' and 'Whois policy'
* On 26 April 2010, ICANN Staff was requesting comment from the
GNSO regarding the draft proposal on the call for volunteers
representing SO/ACs for the Affirmation reviews 'Security Stability and
Resilience of the DNS' and 'Whois policy'
The GNSO council:
* Asks that both Review Teams shall be staffed with 4 GNSO
representatives
* Asks the GNSO council chair to forward his comments made in
response to the draft proposal on the call for volunteers representing
SO/ACs for the Affirmation reviews 'Security Stability and Resilience of
the DNS' and 'Whois policy' to the relevant ICANN body.
Any friendly amendment is welcome.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|