AW: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For the next VI session I strongly support those on the night side being 
provided with HI ("horizontal integrated") facilities.



Best

Wolf-Ulrich 

 


________________________________

        Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
        Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 13:20
        An: Mary Wong; Tim Ruiz
        Cc: GNSO Council
        Betreff: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
        
        
        Our name badges say "ICANN Nairobi West".  :)
         
        Chuck


________________________________

                From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
                Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 6:37 AM
                To: Tim Ruiz
                Cc: GNSO Council
                Subject: RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and 
Motion
                
                
                That's a much better and more imaginative moniker than what 
some of us have been using (viz. the Restonians) - though I doubt you're 
getting much rest back there with the time zone differences!
                 
                Cheers
                Mary
                 
                 
                Mary W S Wong
                Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
                Franklin Pierce Law Center
                Two White Street
                Concord, NH 03301
                USA
                Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Phone: 1-603-513-5143
                Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
                Selected writings available on the Social Science Research 
Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


                >>> 
From:   "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>    
To:      "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      
CC:      "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>        
Date:   3/10/2010 5:49 AM       
Subject:        RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion      
The Reston team - Chuck Gomes, Kristina Rosette, Jeff Neuman, Caroline
Greer, and myself. Otherwise known as the Fab Five ;)

Tim 



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, March 10, 2010 3:13 am
To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

My thanks to Tim and everyone who worked on this motion - I'm glad we
got to a final resolution!

Cheers
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>> 
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>To:"GNSO Council "
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: 3/10/2010 3:29 AMSubject: [council]
Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

Two friendly amendments that I believe most agree resolves the remaining
issues:

Friendly amendment to the charter:

Strike the definition for "Relationship between VI and CO."

Friendly amendment to the motion to add the following resolve:

Resolved further, that the WG is directed to  develop a version of
objective 5 and to recommend it to the Council within three weeks for
either (a) Council approval of the WG-recommended Objective 5  or (b)
Council vote on which version of Objective 5 (as reflected in the draft
Charter of March 10, 2010) should apply.


Tim