Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I want to echo Mary's message. And extend it to thank all the Councillors for 
your help and patience with me this week. I have really felt strong support 
from everyone and I can't tell you how much that has helped and meant to me.

I also want to thank Chuck and Olga for their invaluable help and support.

Needless to say, Marika, Liz, Rob, Glen, Margie and the rest of the Staff 
supporting us have been simply superb.

See you all tomorrow, in person or online, in tomorrow's wrap-up.

Stéphane

Le 10 mars 2010 à 10:13, Mary Wong a écrit :

> My thanks to Tim and everyone who worked on this motion - I'm glad we got to 
> a final resolution!
> 
> Cheers
> Mary
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> 
> >>>
> From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:   "GNSO Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 3/10/2010 3:29 AM
> Subject:      [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
> 
> Two friendly amendments that I believe most agree resolves the remaining
> issues:
> 
> Friendly amendment to the charter:
> 
> Strike the definition for "Relationship between VI and CO."
> 
> Friendly amendment to the motion to add the following resolve:
> 
> Resolved further, that the WG is directed to  develop a version of
> objective 5 and to recommend it to the Council within three weeks for
> either (a) Council approval of the WG-recommended Objective 5  or (b)
> Council vote on which version of Objective 5 (as reflected in the draft
> Charter of March 10, 2010) should apply.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
>