RE: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Reston team - Chuck Gomes, Kristina Rosette, Jeff Neuman, Caroline
Greer, and myself. Otherwise known as the Fab Five ;)

Tim 

 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
From: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, March 10, 2010 3:13 am
To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

My thanks to Tim and everyone who worked on this motion - I'm glad we
got to a final resolution!

Cheers
Mary
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>> 
From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>To:"GNSO Council "
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: 3/10/2010 3:29 AMSubject: [council]
Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

Two friendly amendments that I believe most agree resolves the remaining
issues:

Friendly amendment to the charter:

Strike the definition for "Relationship between VI and CO."

Friendly amendment to the motion to add the following resolve:

Resolved further, that the WG is directed to  develop a version of
objective 5 and to recommend it to the Council within three weeks for
either (a) Council approval of the WG-recommended Objective 5  or (b)
Council vote on which version of Objective 5 (as reflected in the draft
Charter of March 10, 2010) should apply.


Tim