Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I strongly agree with Stéphane and others that a probing discussion of  
GAC's role under the AoC is needed, maybe a 505/50 time split.
Cheers,

Bill


On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

> I agree with Stéphane's second comment (discussing the Affirmation).
>
> What benefit could we possibly get out of discussing the DAG v3 with  
> them? We will know their opinion as they will make it public. I have  
> not found discussing the new gTLD's any benefit in the past and  
> can't see it changing.
> Thanks.
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner- 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 2:17 AM
> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
>
> Thanks Avri.
>
> The DAGv3 is obviously a topic of major interest. We may also wish  
> to ask
> the GAC to tell us how they see their larger role within ICANN as a  
> result
> of the Affirmation...
>
> Stéphane
>
>
> Le 04/10/09 13:34, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thsi topic suggested by the chair of GAC is:
> >
> > *             Meeting with GNSO Council
> > ·               New gTLD policy implementation (DAG v3)
> >
> >
> > He is open to other topics if we would like to suggest one.
> >
> > Is the council ok with it, or would we prefer some other topic?
> >
> > thanks
> > a.
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************