ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:17:04 +1100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <C6EE890B.29725%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <DE93A796-286A-4947-9A92-2EF3528B961B@acm.org> <C6EE890B.29725%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpFBbeL9ajb+J9BaUK116guQ7b/NQAQq56Q
  • Thread-topic: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

I agree with Stéphane's second comment (discussing the Affirmation).

What benefit could we possibly get out of discussing the DAG v3 with them? We 
will know their opinion as they will make it public. I have not found 
discussing the new gTLD's any benefit in the past and can't see it changing.


Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 2:17 AM
To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

Thanks Avri.

The DAGv3 is obviously a topic of major interest. We may also wish to ask
the GAC to tell us how they see their larger role within ICANN as a result
of the Affirmation...


Le 04/10/09 13:34, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi,
> Thsi topic suggested by the chair of GAC is:
> *             Meeting with GNSO Council
> ·               New gTLD policy implementation (DAG v3)
> He is open to other topics if we would like to suggest one.
> Is the council ok with it, or would we prefer some other topic?
> thanks
> a.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>