<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: GNSO Closed Meeting
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: GNSO Closed Meeting
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:53:43 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <3F4F8917F53D5344889872BDDF2F3D3A0112C087@STNTEXCH12.cis.neustar.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 September 2009 17:31:03 GMT+02:00
Subject: GNSO Closed Meeting
Chuck, Adrian, Avri, Mary, Stephane & Kristina
I cannot post on the Council list, but would appreciate this getting
forwarded.
I strongly object to any closed formal meetings of the Council
during the weekend preceding the ICANN meeting for a gripe session
or frankly for any reason. I have attended each of the pre-meetings
of the ICANN meetings for the past I am not sure how many meetings
despite not being on the Council. I am technically an officer of a
constituency, but never attend those meetings in that capacity and
would still object even if I were included.
I participate in these meetings because I truly believe it is where
a lot of the real discussion takes place. The formal GNSO Council
meetings on the Wednesday are more show than discussion. Maybe it
is because there has been so much discussion prior to the Wednesday
meeting that everyone has formulated their opinions, or maybe
Councilors are not comfortable having the discussions up on the
stage, who knows. The reason is not so important.
But there is a HUGE amount of policy topics and discussions that
need to take place on Saturday and Sunday. Its hard enough to find
time to schedule working group meetings during those days (where
many Councilors participate). To take up this precious time to do a
closed gripe session is not only bad for the reasons stated by Avri
and others, but may also disrespectful to other members of the GNSO
Community that do come early to the meetings to work on policy.
If you want to have dinner (after the end of the formal day “on your
own time”), I have no objection to that. That may be a good idea.
But I ask that we not use valuable policy development time for
this. After all, its not really GNSO Council Time, but technically,
GNSO Community time.
There is just too much to do.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax:
+1.703.738.7965 / jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error
and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the
original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|