Re: [council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for providing this very useful summary Olga.

I like option E. I think you made a powerful argument for it during the
Council call.

I would then hope we could work together to assign the other two NCAs
through option D.

Thanks,

Stéphane


Le 04/09/09 20:47, « Olga Cavalli » <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Hi,
> as discussed yesterday in the conference call, and to start the discussion in
> our list, I am including possible options for assigning the role of the three
> NCAs in the new structure of the GNSO Council:
> 
>   
> 
> Option a:   The NCAs talk it through and figure out which roles seem right to
> them.
> 
> Option b:   Random  selection.
> 
> Option c:   The council members decide with random selection of which
> House chooses  first.
> 
> Option d:  The two Houses collaborate  and decide among them where the NCAs
> will be  assigned.
> 
> Option e:  The new, inexperienced NCA rep  assumes the non-voting Council seat
> and one of the above options is used to  assign the two House seats.
> 
> Option f:   The experienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting Coundil seat and
> one of the above options is used to assign the two House seats
> 
> Option g: (Combination of option a and d) The two Houses collaborate  and
> decide among them where the NCAs will be  assigned, with a refusal option by
> any of the NCAs.
> 
> Please iclude other options thay you may think of and share your comments
> about this in the list.
> 
> We should decide about this in our next GNSO conference call on 24 September.
> 
> Best regards
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature