<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:33:57 -0300
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <F45F9DD7-8AEC-4AB1-B509-F269AACC6CF0@acm.org> <56BB89B8B2594B9696240C01B25882E8@PSEVO> <9083EC23-934F-4296-87EF-39FF780FBC30@psg.com> <7903ACA3F58C4AB9A8975799D1A045A0@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Avri,
Perhaps, in this sunset of the GNSO as we
have known it, you may see your way to
accomodating this rather simple request from
three of the existing constituencies.
I beleive that all of us are trying to get the
restructuring process "right", and certain
issues are important to some rather than to
others. I think the Board deserves to be
aware of this.
Thank you.
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:28 AM
Subject: [council] Council vote on by-laws
Avri,
this request is about transparency and relevance.
It is a formal request from the BC.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|