ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws

  • To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:24:45 +1000
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <7903ACA3F58C4AB9A8975799D1A045A0@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <F45F9DD7-8AEC-4AB1-B509-F269AACC6CF0@acm.org> <56BB89B8B2594B9696240C01B25882E8@PSEVO> <9083EC23-934F-4296-87EF-39FF780FBC30@psg.com> <7903ACA3F58C4AB9A8975799D1A045A0@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcoBQfBTJU46lUYdTSWfAyEb5mWzLQAIDwkgAGA62iA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Council vote on by-laws

I agree.

However, seems how your are seeking a more descriptive representation of the 
ballot I think you are only telling half the story in your synopsis Philip.

A description of absentees and abstentions seems more appropriate to me.


Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, 10 July 2009 11:28 PM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Council vote on by-laws

this request is about transparency and relevance.
It is a formal request from the BC.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>