<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:24:45 +1000
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- In-reply-to: <7903ACA3F58C4AB9A8975799D1A045A0@PSEVO>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <F45F9DD7-8AEC-4AB1-B509-F269AACC6CF0@acm.org> <56BB89B8B2594B9696240C01B25882E8@PSEVO> <9083EC23-934F-4296-87EF-39FF780FBC30@psg.com> <7903ACA3F58C4AB9A8975799D1A045A0@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcoBQfBTJU46lUYdTSWfAyEb5mWzLQAIDwkgAGA62iA=
- Thread-topic: [council] Council vote on by-laws
I agree.
However, seems how your are seeking a more descriptive representation of the
ballot I think you are only telling half the story in your synopsis Philip.
A description of absentees and abstentions seems more appropriate to me.
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, 10 July 2009 11:28 PM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Council vote on by-laws
Avri,
this request is about transparency and relevance.
It is a formal request from the BC.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|