<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Council vote on by-laws
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:42:46 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.0.28
Would it be okay to report the vote something like this:
13 Votes in favor:
Tim Ruiz (RrC) 2 votes
Chuck Gomes (RyC) 2 votes
Avri Doria (NCA) 1 vote
etc.
1 Vote against:
Cyril Chua (IPC) 1 vote
Abstained:
Kristina Rosette (IPC) Statement
William Drake (NCUC) Statement
Not present:
Philip Sheppard (CBUC)
Anthony Harris (ISPC)
etc.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Council vote on by-laws
From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, July 10, 2009 9:33 am
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Avri,
Perhaps, in this sunset of the GNSO as we
have known it, you may see your way to
accomodating this rather simple request from
three of the existing constituencies.
I beleive that all of us are trying to get the
restructuring process "right", and certain
issues are important to some rather than to
others. I think the Board deserves to be
aware of this.
Thank you.
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:28 AM
Subject: [council] Council vote on by-laws
>
>
> Avri,
> this request is about transparency and relevance.
> It is a formal request from the BC.
> Philip
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|