ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:37:35 -0300
  • Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=o8dQ/h1vYImCgsFQq9RU2bbSTbE+GE/HwyPqy20ugsA=; b=FR1+AyGbOrZheKMwHogLztemn40wKUgdD3jtwIF/pMw7qhQPf7kgF+JzHfMyy9qFop +BwUAQwdJgoDtbGNugPm9uA9cUDE4I1qJEMXuVhgIbo1+vg7bsB+Oa2MCb7hVurTYcMO eJO3H0ufuSNDWNf4uJP2hB6zA7/aF7vcfn1BU=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=PQCD0xHEhdqrDrk2jBiieWnfxEK1R4XHc3p3gLTSIFVQpAQ0XOcfCl+GKMotbOHUjw cnUbCo7RvQVO/c4z4+RND2WqnR+X/lh+DHteMGZricO0c/cO+kfMeHqSGEcAdnbq+u3S jHFr/MH00POEngIxb/Lwu3dJPveEz/i1g6Ytw=
  • In-reply-to: <542950F3-A677-4F95-B1DE-5A53EB549EDA@psg.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <542950F3-A677-4F95-B1DE-5A53EB549EDA@psg.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree
Olga

2009/5/15 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>

>
> I propose sending the the following to the GAC later today.  I would
> especially be interested in receiving confirmation from the BC, Kristina and
> Mary on the accuracy of the statement I have included on your abstentions.
>
> ---
>
> Dear Janis,
>
> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in response to
> your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO.  This communication has
> been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted  abstention of the
> Commercial and Business Constituency. Additionally both Kristina Rosette and
> Mary Wong, as active participants in the Implementation Recommendation Team
> (IRT), felt that support of this document at this time might be inconsistent
> with their work as part of the IRT and have also abstained.
>
> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment at
> this time.  The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue with the
> GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
>
> The attachment will include Stéphane's 13 May version of the the letter
> with changes accepted and date updated.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>