<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:09:11 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4E22D239-BAB4-4E7A-AB18-02531E0E693B@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnVPM9VlZjwd5x+skiWdbAq1UTqSw==
- Thread-topic: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302
Avri,
I support.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 15/05/09 08:03, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> hi,
>
> ok.
>
> ---
>
> Dear Janis,
>
> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
> response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO. This
> communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
> abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency and of Kristina
> Rosette. Additionally Mary Wong, as an active participant in the
> Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
> document at this time might be inconsistent with her work as part of
> the IRT and has also abstained.
>
> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
> at this time. The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
> with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> ---
>
> On 15 May 2009, at 07:23, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
>
>> Avri,
>>
>> I'm abstaining both because of my IRT work and more generally. I
>> would prefer that you just identify me as abstaining.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> K
>>
>>
>> Kristina Rosette
>> Covington & Burling LLP
>> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
>> Washington, DC 20004-2401
>> voice: 202-662-5173
>> direct fax: 202-778-5173
>> main fax: 202-662-6291
>> e-mail: krosette@xxxxxxx
>>
>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that
>> this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete
>> this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------
>> Sent from my Wireless Handheld
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Fri May 15 01:12:42 2009
>> Subject: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
>>
>>
>> I propose sending the the following to the GAC later today. I would
>> especially be interested in receiving confirmation from the BC,
>> Kristina and Mary on the accuracy of the statement I have included on
>> your abstentions.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Dear Janis,
>>
>> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
>> response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO. This
>> communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
>> abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency. Additionally
>> both Kristina Rosette and Mary Wong, as active participants in the
>> Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
>> document at this time might be inconsistent with their work as part of
>> the IRT and have also abstained.
>>
>> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
>> at this time. The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
>> with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> --
>>
>> The attachment will include Stéphane's 13 May version of the the
>> letter with changes accepted and date updated.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|