ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:09:11 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <4E22D239-BAB4-4E7A-AB18-02531E0E693B@psg.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnVPM9VlZjwd5x+skiWdbAq1UTqSw==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302

Avri,

I support.

Thanks,

Stéphane


Le 15/05/09 08:03, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> hi,
> 
> ok.
> 
> ---
> 
> Dear Janis,
> 
> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
> response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO.  This
> communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
> abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency and of Kristina
> Rosette.  Additionally Mary Wong, as an active participant in the
> Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
> document at this time might be inconsistent with her work as part of
> the IRT and has also abstained.
> 
> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
> at this time.  The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
> with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> ---
> 
> On 15 May 2009, at 07:23, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> 
>> Avri,
>> 
>> I'm abstaining both because of my IRT work and more generally.  I
>> would prefer that you just identify me as abstaining.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> K
>> 
>> 
>> Kristina Rosette
>> Covington & Burling LLP
>> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
>> Washington, DC  20004-2401
>> voice:  202-662-5173
>> direct fax:  202-778-5173
>> main fax:  202-662-6291
>> e-mail:  krosette@xxxxxxx
>> 
>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
>> confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that
>> this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete
>> this e-mail from your system.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------
>> Sent from my Wireless Handheld
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Fri May 15 01:12:42 2009
>> Subject: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
>> 
>> 
>> I propose sending the the following to the GAC later today.  I would
>> especially be interested in receiving confirmation from the BC,
>> Kristina and Mary on the accuracy of the statement I have included on
>> your abstentions.
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Dear Janis,
>> 
>> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
>> response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO.  This
>> communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
>> abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency. Additionally
>> both Kristina Rosette and Mary Wong, as active participants in the
>> Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
>> document at this time might be inconsistent with their work as part of
>> the IRT and have also abstained.
>> 
>> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
>> at this time.  The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
>> with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> The attachment will include Stéphane's 13 May version of the the
>> letter with changes accepted and date updated.
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>