<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
- From: "Tony Holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:49:27 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=MTb0rRPbCXcmlGQdL/X4lEFm7nifsKtYCL01k+Agn+hlljNzPxiFZD74wkKI3hd0FMpYZQe2ghVmA5zo17LM2D5dCk1uiX/sjPkYAKUpc2aVKAGXrI2O6xPxMUGsu5/7V0A9czOr9vxY38zaMwsJ52I6Wv9YYl+VxJeIvchuwm0= ;
- In-reply-to: <4E22D239-BAB4-4E7A-AB18-02531E0E693B@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C727068E86C4@cbiexm04dc.cov.com> <4E22D239-BAB4-4E7A-AB18-02531E0E693B@psg.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnVIwdPYegvHgzYT8a2ziUcsMp3mgADmjLQ
Avri
Getting an overall ISP view on this isn't proving easy, but I'll get back to
you later today.
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: 15 May 2009 07:04
To: council@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
hi,
ok.
---
Dear Janis,
Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO. This
communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency and of Kristina
Rosette. Additionally Mary Wong, as an active participant in the
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
document at this time might be inconsistent with her work as part of
the IRT and has also abstained.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
at this time. The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
Best Regards,
---
On 15 May 2009, at 07:23, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> Avri,
>
> I'm abstaining both because of my IRT work and more generally. I
> would prefer that you just identify me as abstaining.
>
> Thanks.
>
> K
>
>
> Kristina Rosette
> Covington & Burling LLP
> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
> Washington, DC 20004-2401
> voice: 202-662-5173
> direct fax: 202-778-5173
> main fax: 202-662-6291
> e-mail: krosette@xxxxxxx
>
> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that
> this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete
> this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
> Sent from my Wireless Handheld
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri May 15 01:12:42 2009
> Subject: [council] Proposed cover letter for GNSO Letter to GAC
>
>
> I propose sending the the following to the GAC later today. I would
> especially be interested in receiving confirmation from the BC,
> Kristina and Mary on the accuracy of the statement I have included on
> your abstentions.
>
> ---
>
> Dear Janis,
>
> Attached please find a letter from the GNSO Council written in
> response to your opem letter of April 24 2009 to the ICANN CEO. This
> communication has been approved by the GNSO Council with the noted
> abstention of the Commercial and Business Constituency. Additionally
> both Kristina Rosette and Mary Wong, as active participants in the
> Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT), felt that support of this
> document at this time might be inconsistent with their work as part of
> the IRT and have also abstained.
>
> Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for accepting our comment
> at this time. The GNSO Council looks forward to discussing the issue
> with the GAC at our joint meeting in Sydney.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
>
> The attachment will include Stéphane's 13 May version of the the
> letter with changes accepted and date updated.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|