<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
- To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:34:05 -0700
- Cc: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.14.14
May sound strange coming from me since I supported this idea initially,
but after all the comments that have been submitted (still reading them)
and the criticisms that have been made, is it wise for us to try and
hurry this up in any way?
And a couple of procedural questions:
1) What is the threshold for Council approval?
2) Will the Board have to also approve this?
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Motion regarding New gTLDs
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, December 17, 2008 7:37 am
To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Avri,
I just realized that the attached motion regarding the 4-month
communication period that I submitted on 21 November has been left off
the agenda for our Council meeting tomorrow.
Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|