Re: [council] Travel support draft text

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, this change makes sense.


On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Greg Ruth wrote:

> I agree with this change.
> Greg
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:11:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [council] Travel support draft text
>
> Phillip,
> yo make a good suggestion.
> I personally agree. If I do not hear any other comments I will  
> rewrite the draft document.
> We should review this issue during our next conference call.
> Best
> Olga
>
> 2008/12/8 Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
> Olga, thanks for circulating this.
> Seems fine.
> On reporting I think we can be transparent without being  
> bureaucratic and burdensome on volunteers.
> There is no merit in 15 Council members all writing a report saying  
> "I attended a Council meeting".
> Moreover, I presume the system is that Constituencies nominate who  
> gets the support but then the individual still needs to apply to  
> ICANN staff for that support ?
> If so staff is fully informed of who gets what and other staff is  
> fully informed of who attended what.
> Suggest the following instead:
> Philip
>
> --------------------
> Transparency and Reporting:
>
> ICANN staff will publish the names of all those who receive travel  
> support together with a list of the relevant meeting(s) for which  
> the support was given and which were attended by the support  
> recipient.



IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx