RE: [council] Travel support draft text

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree. So what are the next steps?

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Travel support draft text
From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, December 10, 2008 12:34 pm
To: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Philip Sheppard
<philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, this change makes sense. 


On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Greg Ruth wrote:

I agree with this change.

Greg
From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Travel support draft text

Phillip,
yo make a good suggestion.
I personally agree. If I do not hear any other comments I will rewrite
the draft document.
We should review this issue during our next conference call.
Best
Olga

2008/12/8 Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Olga, thanks for circulating this.
Seems fine.
On reporting I think we can be transparent without being bureaucratic
and burdensome on volunteers.
There is no merit in 15 Council members all writing a report saying "I
attended a Council meeting".
Moreover, I presume the system is that Constituencies nominate who gets
the support but then the individual still needs to apply to ICANN staff
for that support ?
If so staff is fully informed of who gets what and other staff is fully
informed of who attended what.
Suggest the following instead:
Philip

--------------------
Transparency and Reporting:
ICANN staff will publish the names of all those who receive travel
support together with a list of the relevant meeting(s) for which the
support was given and which were attended by the support recipient.

 
















IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx