Re: [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

At this point, I believe that I should submit Philip's cover letter  
with Rob's staff report on the status of the work being done.
This seems to be a compromise between Chuck's optimism and Philip's  
caution.  I will not add any comment to the effect that we may now be  
questioning some of the reasoning behind the bifurcation that produced  
the proposal fr  bi-cameral organization.
Thanks.

a.

On 7 Dec 2008, at 15:19, Robert Hoggarth wrote:

> Dear Council Members;
>
> Many thanks to Chuck Gomes for helpful feedback on the last version  
> of the draft document.  In view of the lack of comments to Chuck’s  
> feedback, I decided to circulate a further revised draft version of  
> the GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report that incorporates  
> some of his suggestions in hopes that the changes will make it  
> easier for Council members to review and comment. This version  
> leaves Chuck’s  previous comments in place.
> Thanks to Ken Bour’s thoughtful contribution and formatting wizardry  
> this draft version has converted the draft key process and  
> implementation decision inventory into a chronological chart.  The  
> new format should make it easier for all council members to evaluate  
> and comment on the inventory and draft chronology and allow faster  
> and more efficient editing.
> In light of another comment from Chuck, I also added some edits to  
> the Calendar section in February and March with respect to the  
> timing for submitting new Stakeholder Group charters. All should  
> note that the charter submission deadline will arrive sooner than  
> you might otherwise have anticipated.
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
>
> On 12/5/08 5:19 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Rob.  To get the discussion going, I inserted some comments  
> along with a few minor edits that are highlighted on the attached  
> file.
> Chuck
>
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> ] On Behalf Of Robert  Hoggarth
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:40 PM
> To:  Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] For Discussion - Draft GNSO Council  Restructure  
> Implementation Report
>
> Dear Council  Members;
>
> Based on the active email discussion prior to Thanksgiving, I  have  
> taken the liberty of creating a new draft version of the Council’s   
> required report to the Board on its plans for transitioning to the  
> new  bicameral Council structure by June 2009.
> I addition to using some  specific text recommendations by Philip  
> Sheppard and Chuck Gomes in the  introductory section, I am hopeful  
> that I have gotten close to capturing the  spirit of the Council’s  
> discussion on this matter to date.  There are a  number of notable  
> changes to which I draw your attention:
>
> 	• I added a section  suggested by Philip that highlights  
> “fundamental community principles to be  followed.”
> 	• I added a section  suggested by Chuck that highlights “Council  
> implementation priorities.”
> 	• I streamlined the  “Calendar/Deadlines” section but did not  
> combine/integrate that section with  the “Inventory of Key Processes  
> and Implementation Decisions” section,  pending a final resolution  
> of that list and a decision by the Council on the  order of priority.
> Consistent with your discussion during the last  Council meeting, I  
> hope this draft version will make it possible for all  interested  
> parties to edit, comment and move toward a Council agreement on the   
> list so that a status report can be submitted to the Board by early  
> next  week.
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
>
> <GNSO Council Restructuring Implementation Plan (RHv3; CGv1; KBv1)7  
> Dec 08.doc>