Re: [council] Draft charter for IRTf Paart A PDP WG charter

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 10 Jul 2008, at 17:42, Olof Nordling wrote:

> Avri, Chuck, all,
> Starting with Chuck's item 2 - I fully agree that it's a real  
> squeeze. Let's recall that the PDP rules set out 15 days for this  
> (constituency statements due at T+35 and Initial Report due at T+50)  
> and even that isn't easy, although doable (based on experience;-).
makes sense, especially since that is still the by-laws timing.

> Then, recalling what we did for the IDN WG, we used the term  
> Outcomes Report (in drafts 1 to n until we got consensus, then  
> calling it "final", or rather skipping the prefix "draft" - this in  
> order to save the expression Final Report to something endorsed by  
> the Council.
I have long thought of Final report as name required by the by-laws  
for the document that is produced after the constituency reports and  
before the deliberations,  and not an indicator of ordinality.
In any case I have modified the milestones to try and take care of  
these issues.
> Just my two Euro-cents on this for now.
I await further euros.

> Best regards
thanks,

a.