ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Agenda Items for Joint Meeting with the ccNSO

  • To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Agenda Items for Joint Meeting with the ccNSO
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxrodenbaugh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:13:22 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE; b=WiUvk8FQDsKc8JTG2meGb/bb744pNgQ6bsG/6KA5jLHkm0NBHG4M1Z+UgFdXFWsI4Y64pX3lP49LXioHISzgfKkcFV/epoafdArMYTVQ6nPClVsXj0WHjwYb1VDH+NL6poLwFNBqY/AH/gqHxtXIhx5m0rKxjds6L5gbihXAUSE= ;
  • In-reply-to: <B1F2C0DE-47BE-4731-8E8B-6B73ED335D03@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Aci6ueTGR9bza684SLGBfwvigX+1DwAFFBKQ
Thanks Avri.  Certainly we should spend plenty of time on the issues with
fast-track that you have identified.  

It also might be worth some time to chat about how the ccNSO and the GNSO
could communicate and work together in some respects, more effectively and
regularly.  Perhaps there could be a regular communication by which we stay
abreast of each other's activity.  Further, when they develop a policy we
ought to consider its implications in the generic space, and vice versa when
we develop a policy.  Maybe just a standard process where we send them our
resolutions and ask them to consider them and offer comments back to us, and
vice versa.  Perhaps a brief discussion will raise some other ideas.

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:36 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Agenda Items for Joint Meeting with the ccNSO


Hi,

We have a joint meeting with the ccNSO planned for 26 June in Paris.   
ths is a SO-SO meeting.  Not exactly sure yet how this is going to be  
organized, but we ned to work out an agenda.

I assume that we will want to talk about the Fast Track and perhaps  
other issues.  Suggestions are welcome.  My first thoughts would  
center around subjects such as;

- Meaning of non-controversial in the the Fast Track process.   
Currently the scope of non-controversial is limited to within a  
region.  This scope and its implication is perhaps worth talking about.

- The idea of an objection process or some other mechanism for  
allowing questions to be raised during the fast track if an  
application from a territory seems problematic to the GSNO or one of  
its constituencies or members.

- Technical, operational and other conditions in  fast track  
approval.  Are there any parallels between the IDN ccTLD fast track  
process and the IDN gTLD process?

I welcome other suggestions.  I would think 3 or 4 topics would  
probably be sufficient.

Thanks

a.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>