ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:42:55 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <013001c89be8$4d2cf8d0$0202fea9@united.domain>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20080411040845.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.f4143b6916.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <00aa01c89bc7$d26041e0$0202fea9@united.domain> <012101c89be2$e1b50430$a51f0c90$@com> <013001c89be8$4d2cf8d0$0202fea9@united.domain>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Hi,

In preparing for the meeting, I have reread the motion and have a process problem with it.

To initiate a PDP we have a 33%+ threshold if in scope else 66% ( cf. X.6.3c) To decide on whether to do a Task Force we need a 50%+1 vote. (cf. X. 6.4, X.7)

By combining the two into a single motion we have something that is neither beast nor fowl. I think that we need to split them into 2 motions:

1 to initiate the PDP on the specific issues. This will help us to determine if we in scope of not.

2. to form a task force

Thanks.

a.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>