<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:42:55 -0400
- In-reply-to: <013001c89be8$4d2cf8d0$0202fea9@united.domain>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20080411040845.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.f4143b6916.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <00aa01c89bc7$d26041e0$0202fea9@united.domain> <012101c89be2$e1b50430$a51f0c90$@com> <013001c89be8$4d2cf8d0$0202fea9@united.domain>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
In preparing for the meeting, I have reread the motion and have a
process problem with it.
To initiate a PDP we have a 33%+ threshold if in scope else 66% ( cf.
X.6.3c)
To decide on whether to do a Task Force we need a 50%+1 vote. (cf. X.
6.4, X.7)
By combining the two into a single motion we have something that is
neither beast nor fowl. I think that we need to split them into 2
motions:
1 to initiate the PDP on the specific issues. This will help us to
determine if we in scope of not.
2. to form a task force
Thanks.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|