ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue


Avri,

do we have any kind of advice from the GC if the proposed motion is in scope
or not? If we don't, how are we going to make a decison on this if the 66%
treshold is not reached?

Best,

tom

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. April 2008 19:43
> An: Council GNSO
> Betreff: [council] Fast Flux Hosting - Motion issue
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In preparing for the meeting, I have reread the motion and
> have a process problem with it.
>
> To initiate a PDP we have a 33%+ threshold if in scope else
> 66% ( cf.
> X.6.3c)
> To decide on whether to do a Task Force we need a 50%+1 vote. (cf. X.
> 6.4, X.7)
>
> By combining the two into a single motion we have something
> that is neither beast nor fowl.  I think that we need to
> split them into 2
> motions:
>
> 1 to initiate the PDP on the specific issues.  This will help
> us to determine if we in scope of not.
>
> 2. to form a task force
>
> Thanks.
>
> a.
>
>
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>