<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
- To: <avri@xxxxxxx>, <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:38:25 -0400
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AciWIcouVq2ombKfQsmJglC4CpISqAAN16IB
- Thread-topic: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
I would also like clarification as to whether this is purely informative or
whether the staff anticipates that Council will be able to provide reaction,
guidance, etc. The distinction is very important not only in terms of
preparation (including trying to schedule constituency meetings within the next
5 days), but also attendance (especially for those prospective attendees whose
travel time is likely to far exceed the actual meeting time).
Thanks.
K
Kristina Rosette
Covington & Burling LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004-2401
voice: 202-662-5173
direct fax: 202-778-5173
main fax: 202-662-6291
e-mail: krosette@xxxxxxx
This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been
inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------------------
Sent from my Wireless Handheld
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri Apr 04 03:00:13 2008
Subject: Re: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April
2008
Hi Karen,
Thank you for the agenda.
I have some questions:
Is this purely an informational session or are there specific issues
and questions the council is being asked to react/respond to? As I
read the agenda, it seems like an informational session. If I am
reading the agenda incorrectly, and there are issues that we need to
discuss, I would be grateful if the council could be informed about
these as soon as possible.
Also I would like to reiterate my request for the implementation notes
that we have been requesting, and which were promised to us, as soon
as possible.
Finally as this agenda was produced by the staff without consultation,
I am assuming that the staff is planning to run the meeting. If this
is not the case, please let me know.
thanks
a.
On 4 Apr 2008, at 04:48, Karen Lentz wrote:
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Please find attached the expected agenda for the face to face
> meeting next week in Los Angeles. We have organized the discussion
> according to the GNSO's Terms of Reference, with the approximate
> time frames allotted for each. Additional presentation materials
> will be distributed prior to the meeting, and these are forthcoming.
>
> Staff looks forward to a constructive session. Please let us know
> if you have additional questions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Karen
>
> -
>
> Karen Lentz
> The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> 4676 Admiralty Way, No. 330
> Marina del Rey, CA 90292
> +1 310 301 5836 office
> +1 310 895 3637 mobile
> karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx
> <GNSO-gTLDs-Agenda-10-11-apr-08.pdf>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|