<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
- To: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:13:45 -0400
- In-reply-to: <47F5E6A8.7000407@gnso.icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AciWLjPyUWGuzroNRk2ZPJMgKNly4QAJNQOg
- Thread-topic: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
Thanks Glen.
This is an extremely full agenda for one day. Assuming there are no
recommendations for which there are serious implementation challenges, it might
be fine. But I seriously suspect that is not the case. As we all though,
there are 3 or 4 recommendations that may present some difficulties in terms of
implementing them in an objective manner. If any of those require significant
changes, then I believe that considerable time may be needed to discuss them.
Not knowing the latest status of implementation plans, it is not possible for
me to know whether the time is sufficient or not, but I think it would be very
unfortunate if we did not have sufficient time to discuss the more challenging
recommendations.
Clearly, the recommendations under Term of Reference II (Selection Criteria)
will require the most time and, in fact, more time is allocated for them, but
it still may not be sufficient. Here are a couple of ideas for gaining more
time for ToR II:
- Start the meeting at 8 am.
- Provide written information about the morning agenda items in advance
of the meeting and simply provide a very brief overview and allow for questions
and answers and discussion on those items that participants identify. It seems
to me that very few of these present anywhere near the implementation
challenges of the some of those in the afternoon part of the agenda, so they
could more easily be handled without an in-person session. This would possibly
allow for combining all three ToRs into one or at most two sessions.
These two ideas are not mutually exclusive and I am sure there are others ways
we could maximize the time spent on the most challenging recommendations.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 4:28 AM
To: 'Council GNSO'
Subject: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008
Dear Councilors,
The face to face meetings in Los Angeles will take place at the LAX Hilton
Hotel in the Carmel room, the same place that the GNSO had for its working
sessions during 2007 ICANN meetings in Los Angeles. There is a free shuttle
from the airport to the hotel.
Remote participation on Friday, 11 April 2008 will be available, and details
will follow.
Please contact me off the list for travel and hotel arrangements if you have
not already done so.
Thank you.
Kind regards
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|