Re: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on 10-11 April 2008

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I would like to know that as well.
And most unfortunately, no mater how much I ask, I have not been able  
to find out the answer.
a.


On 4 Apr 2008, at 15:38, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> I would also like clarification as to whether this is purely  
> informative or whether the staff anticipates that Council will be  
> able to provide reaction, guidance, etc.  The distinction is very  
> important not only in terms of preparation (including trying to  
> schedule constituency meetings within the next 5 days), but also  
> attendance (especially for those prospective attendees whose travel  
> time is likely to far exceed the actual meeting time).
> Thanks.
>
> K
>
>
> Kristina Rosette
> Covington & Burling LLP
> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
> Washington, DC  20004-2401
> voice:  202-662-5173
> direct fax:  202-778-5173
> main fax:  202-662-6291
> e-mail:  krosette@xxxxxxx
>
> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is  
> confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended  
> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that  
> this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete  
> this e-mail from your system.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
> Sent from my Wireless Handheld
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri Apr 04 03:00:13 2008
> Subject: Re: [council] Agenda for New gTLD face to face meeting on  
> 10-11 April 2008
>
> Hi Karen,
>
> Thank you for the agenda.
>
> I have some questions:
>
> Is this purely an informational session or are there specific issues
> and questions the council is being asked to react/respond to?  As I
> read the agenda, it seems like an informational session.   If I am
> reading the agenda incorrectly, and there are issues that we need to
> discuss, I would be grateful if the council could be informed about
> these as soon as possible.
>
> Also I would like to reiterate my request for the implementation notes
> that we have been requesting, and which were promised to us, as soon
> as possible.
>
> Finally as this agenda was produced by the staff without consultation,
> I am assuming that the staff is planning to run the meeting.  If this
> is not the case, please let me know.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 4 Apr 2008, at 04:48, Karen Lentz wrote:
> > Dear Councilors,
> >
> > Please find attached the expected agenda for the face to face
> > meeting next week in Los Angeles.  We have organized the discussion
> > according to the GNSO's Terms of Reference, with the approximate
> > time frames allotted for each.  Additional presentation materials
> > will be distributed prior to the meeting, and these are forthcoming.
> >
> > Staff looks forward to a constructive session.  Please let us know
> > if you have additional questions.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Karen
> >
> > -
> >
> > Karen Lentz
> > The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> > 4676 Admiralty Way, No. 330
> > Marina del Rey, CA  90292
> > +1 310 301 5836 office
> > +1 310 895 3637 mobile
> > karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx
> > <GNSO-gTLDs-Agenda-10-11-apr-08.pdf>