ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] new gtld implementation mtg in Delhi - board & staff

  • To: "Robin Gross" <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] new gtld implementation mtg in Delhi - board & staff
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:50:12 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <1271A4CE-FC7E-443E-8ACD-119A3FD0840B@ipjustice.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AchlXVTzY2G4gutXRHOjNs+ZwP3UkAATLF1w
  • Thread-topic: [council] new gtld implementation mtg in Delhi - board & staff

Whether this happens or not, I strongly believe that staff needs to
provide us the following information in New Delhi, possibly in the
session scheduled on that topic for Saturday afternoon:
 
1. In what ways has staff implementation work deviated from
recommendations by the GNSO?
2. For which recommendations is there indication do some Board members
have reservations and hence may not approve?
3. What process will be followed to involve the GNSO in either of the
two above cases?
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 12:29 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] new gtld implementation mtg in Delhi - board & staff


Dear Colleagues,

Probably many of us are interested in having a better understanding of
how the new gtld implementation plans are evolving at the board and
staff levels.  In our recent conference call it was mentioned that the
staff implementation team will meet with the board in New Delhi to
discuss the implementation plans in more detail.  I'd like to propose we
request to be allowed to sit-in on that meeting and listen to the
discussion on how implementation plans are proceeding.  Another
possibility is to request that the meeting be audio recorded (or
transcribed) and that we be allowed to listen to an .mp3 of the
discussion.  I can't imagine any reason why this discussion would be
confidential from us and it certainly would aid in our understanding. 

Thanks,
Robin






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>