ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Concluding the work of the Transfers Review WG.

Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thanks Ross.  Much appreciated.  Regarding your proposed motion, my only
concern is the time period for constituency comments.  I recognize that
it says "no less than 14 days" so it could be longer, but I would
suggest that it be changed to say "no less than 21 days".  Two week
turn-around for constituencies is often quite hard to do.

Looking back, it probably would have been easier to specify an explicit timeline for comments. I'd be happy to incorporate a consensus view of what a proper length of time for comments might be as a friendly amendment. I'm not aware of any timing considerations that would cause us to want to opt for a shorter time period. Perhaps we can take suggestions for a proper timeline on the call this week?


Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
Tucows Inc.

t. 416.538.5492

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>