RE: [council] GNSO Council teleconference MP3 recording 24 May 2007

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Note Mawaki that even if your count is correct, the motion would still pass 
because only 25% is needed, which I believe would be 7 (25% of 27 = 6.75).

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it 
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, 
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the 
original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mawaki Chango
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:05 PM
> To: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council teleconference MP3 
> recording 24 May 2007
> 
> Council,
> 
> My apologies I was finally not available to make it to today 
> teleconf as I had expected.
> 
> I just listened to the MP3. Regarding the item 5 (see below), 
> my count of the votes does not match the one you announced on 
> the call, Bruce, i.e. "10 votes in favor". I have counted 8 
> YES (Bruce, Philip, Kristina, Mike, Ross, Alistair, Tony, and Greg),
> 6 NO (Avri, Robin, Norbert, Sophia, Chuck, and Edmond), and 1 
> Abstention (Thomas).
> 
> So I'd request that the correct results be confirmed (after 
> double-checking), and if relevant, the subsequent request of 
> an issue report on IGO names be reconsidered.
> Thanks,
> 
> Mawaki
> 
> Item 5:  Motion to request issues report on protecting IGO 
> names and abbreviations
> 
> Whereas, the GNSO Council recognizes the recommendation put 
> forward by the IPC Constituency regarding possible measures 
> in line with
> WIPO-2 to
> protect International Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO) 
> names and abbreviations as domain names.
> 
> Whereas, the GNSO Council notes that measures to protect IGO 
> names and abbreviations are requested in the GAC principles 
> for New gTLDs.
> 
> Whereas, the GNSO Council notes that WIPO is the maintenance 
> agency for the authoritative list of relevant IGO names and 
> abbreviations protected under Article 6ter of the Paris 
> Convention (http://www.wipo.int/article6ter/en/ ).
> 
> The GNSO Council requests that the staff produce an issues 
> report on the policy issues associated with adequately 
> handling disputes relating to IGO names and abbreviations as 
> domain names.
> 
> The GNSO Council also requests that the staff liaise with 
> WIPO to utilize its knowledge and experience of WIPO-2. 
> 
> Bruce,
> 
> 
> 
> --- "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org
> > [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org]
> > 
> > Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council 
> teleconference, held 
> > on 24 May 2007 at:
> > 
> > http://gnso-audio.icann.org/GNSO-Council-20070524.mp3
> > http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#may
> > 
> > Happy listening!
> > 
> > Glen de Saint Géry
> > GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> > gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> > http://gnso.icann.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>