RE: [council] GNSO Council teleconference MP3 recording 24 May 2007

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Apparently, you mean 25% of the whole council, not of those
voting. Subject to confirmation, there were still more than 25%
on the call who did not vote YES (6 No and 1 Abstention.) 

My point is, even if the percentage count is against the size of
the whole council, you may still have 25% or more voting for one
position, and similarly 25% or more voting in the other
direction. How does one deal with that if the only requirement
is to reach 25% for a decision to be made? Is there any
consideration about the significance of count difference? For
example if 8 voted YES and 9 voted NO: both are beyond 25% and
the difference is one vote - would NO simply be the outcome? 

Thanks,
Mawaki


--- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Note Mawaki that even if your count is correct, the motion
> would still pass because only 25% is needed, which I believe
> would be 7 (25% of 27 = 6.75).
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or
> disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, please notify sender immediately and
> destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mawaki
> Chango
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:05 PM
> > To: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Council GNSO'
> > Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council teleconference MP3 
> > recording 24 May 2007
> > 
> > Council,
> > 
> > My apologies I was finally not available to make it to today
> 
> > teleconf as I had expected.
> > 
> > I just listened to the MP3. Regarding the item 5 (see
> below), 
> > my count of the votes does not match the one you announced
> on 
> > the call, Bruce, i.e. "10 votes in favor". I have counted 8 
> > YES (Bruce, Philip, Kristina, Mike, Ross, Alistair, Tony,
> and Greg),
> > 6 NO (Avri, Robin, Norbert, Sophia, Chuck, and Edmond), and
> 1 
> > Abstention (Thomas).
> > 
> > So I'd request that the correct results be confirmed (after 
> > double-checking), and if relevant, the subsequent request of
> 
> > an issue report on IGO names be reconsidered.
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Mawaki
> > 
> > Item 5:  Motion to request issues report on protecting IGO 
> > names and abbreviations
> > 
> > Whereas, the GNSO Council recognizes the recommendation put 
> > forward by the IPC Constituency regarding possible measures 
> > in line with
> > WIPO-2 to
> > protect International Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO) 
> > names and abbreviations as domain names.
> > 
> > Whereas, the GNSO Council notes that measures to protect IGO
> 
> > names and abbreviations are requested in the GAC principles 
> > for New gTLDs.
> > 
> > Whereas, the GNSO Council notes that WIPO is the maintenance
> 
> > agency for the authoritative list of relevant IGO names and 
> > abbreviations protected under Article 6ter of the Paris 
> > Convention (http://www.wipo.int/article6ter/en/ ).
> > 
> > The GNSO Council requests that the staff produce an issues 
> > report on the policy issues associated with adequately 
> > handling disputes relating to IGO names and abbreviations as
> 
> > domain names.
> > 
> > The GNSO Council also requests that the staff liaise with 
> > WIPO to utilize its knowledge and experience of WIPO-2. 
> > 
> > Bruce,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> > <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org
> > > [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org;
> council[at]gnso.icann.org]
> > > 
> > > Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council 
> > teleconference, held 
> > > on 24 May 2007 at:
> > > 
> > > http://gnso-audio.icann.org/GNSO-Council-20070524.mp3
> > > http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#may
> > > 
> > > Happy listening!
> > > 
> > > Glen de Saint Géry
> > > GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> > > gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> > > http://gnso.icann.org
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>