<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding term limits - GNSO review
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Regarding term limits - GNSO review
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:09:46 -0800
- In-reply-to: <009f01c703dc$d8aa8210$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
- References: <009f01c703dc$d8aa8210$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
If I read the LSE report correctly and understood the talk we got,
this was one of the recommendations that could be taken independently.
Additionally, I don't think there was an agreement to not take
piecemeal steps, only an argument by some that we shouldn't. I am
afraid that if we wait for the day that we do all or nothing, we will
do nothing. But perhaps this is a misplaced fear.
a.
On 9 nov 2006, at 00.55, Philip Sheppard wrote:
I disagree with this.
I thought we had had an earlier discussion about the need to avoid
taking piecemeal
recommendations from one or other GNSO review?
We need to consider changes holistically and within the context
outlined at the last Council
meeting.
Philip
PS Constituencies already have internal rules - that is bottom-up.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|