<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Regarding term limits - GNSO review
- To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Regarding term limits - GNSO review
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:55:46 +0100
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540379BF15@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AccDc2Y8fN7Lxmj8RLipwgPWoPZ6WAAB11TgABJRpWAABhdaYA==
I disagree with this.
I thought we had had an earlier discussion about the need to avoid taking
piecemeal
recommendations from one or other GNSO review?
We need to consider changes holistically and within the context outlined at the
last Council
meeting.
Philip
PS Constituencies already have internal rules - that is bottom-up.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|