Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN operating plan

["Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>]

Marilyn,

I just want to make sure that while I support all 'Constituency Councilors'
should be accommodated for the travel expense issue that Bruce proposed, I
also want to voice that the policy we are supporting to accommodate the
'Constituency Councilors' does not override/disadvantage the policy that
already exist for the NomComm appointees.

I think it is a fair play to accommodate both in their respective positions.

regards,
Sophia


On 11/04/06, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Thanks, Sophia, for asking what I meant.
>
> I was thinking of the "short policy meetings" as like the D.C. meeting and
> the upcoming European meeting, where the meeting is 2-3 days, versus a 5-7
> day ICANN face to face meeting which takes place 3 X a year.
>
> However, Liz has done more work already, I think on this topic, so my
> 'back of the envelop" ideas of estimates, may not be needed.
>
>  Marilyn
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Sophia B
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:35 PM
> *To:* Marilyn Cade
> *Cc:* Philip Sheppard; Bruce Tonkin; GNSO Council; Kurt Pritz; Liz
> Williams; Olof Nordling
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN
> operating plan
>
>
>
> Marilyn,
>
>
>
> Could you please describe what you mean by:
>
>  1- Short policy meetings.  What is included, air ticket, hotel & meal,
> number of days etc..
>
> 2- Week long ICANN meeting FTF, the same.
>
>
> Note: I am hoping your budget estimates for the travel cost of an
> international ticket /trip is different from local. If not please advise.
>
>
> Additionally, it is in any corporate travel policy, not sure have to ck
> labor law, that anything over 6hrs s/b business class.  This should also be
> consistent with current ICAAN travel policy.  Considering that we are not
> paid, I assumed the existing travel policy of ICANN is fair/consistant with
> that of most organization that actually are on paid travel.
>
>  regards,
>
> Sophia
>
>
> On 11/04/06, *Marilyn Cade* <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear all, I believe that we need to give Kurt a rather firm estimate of
> costs for travel for Councilors asap. If we 'ballpark' an estimate of
> $3,000
> USD for short policy meetings, and $5,000 for the week long ICANN face to
> face meetings, will that provide a firm enough estimate? I would also
> propose that perhaps we plan to budget two policy development meetings
> face
> to face, outside of the three ICANN meetings.
>
> I am happy to work with Glen on a straw proposal for the budget  if we can
> get a general agreement for a "template" approach.  Perhaps Ken would also
> be willing, as part of the Adm. Planning group to work on this?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:51 AM
> To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'GNSO Council'
> Cc: 'Kurt Pritz'; 'Liz Williams'; 'Olof Nordling'
> Subject: RE: [council] Proposed approach to travel funding in the ICANN
> operating plan
>
> Bruce, I fully endorse this proposal.
> Its a significant step forward for a more professional organisation.
>
> Philip
>
>
>