<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Delayed approval
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Delayed approval
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:58:34 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JjKCLEhQedJEp07+jDojkhul6JIMpHgm3jI+chRjFjrwaD9GLUYY0+ZTTzYjdhYWCTBP+18nz5Mz6rJm4ijuyuyxH5zHMNgyeKePeKfGBHJSJW+DAzBX4JF24OL49vDyP/R7kDtGkwEXdqAwsB9qxjg+oIaV7HDV2vucrIGssEY= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sometimes I put an action in a subconscious space in my brain. When I know that an event will happen with complete certainty, I just log it as done.
This was such an event that I just knew would occur. So now that it has come to pass I have to ask why did I just log it as a fait compli.
http://webhosting.devshed.com/c/a/Web-Hosting-News/ICANN-VeriSign-com-Agreement-Wins-DoC-Approval/
Well I know the answer. So now I have to ask; is the reason good or bad? Well I think that the reason is good. And the process seems to be good. However I do not like the result. Not the resulting agreement but that the running of dotCOM is the result of the settling of a lawsuit that has nothing to do with the benefit to the internet and its users.
If that seems circuitous it is because it is.
e
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|