ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Extensions of Deadlines for gTLD Agreement Renewal Processes

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Extensions of Deadlines for gTLD Agreement Renewal Processes
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:47:56 -0700
  • Cc: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "vinton g. cerf" <vint@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <20060803125509.57688.qmail@web53302.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Good questions Danny, and nicely ask as well.  The answer
to your first question is of course yes.

  I would like to ask any BoD member to offer their answers to
these questions as it is likely that Veni will again either obviscate
or not answer.

Danny Younger wrote:

> Veni has kindly pointed to the 10 January 2006 Board
> Resolution 06.02:  "Resolved, the President and the
> General Counsel are authorized to continue
> negotiations with any such registry operator(s) in
> accordance with existing contractual terms, and are
> authorized to extend the relevant renewal process
> deadlines as necessary and appropriate for up to six
> full months, while discussions continue."
>
> I would ask the following questions:
>
> 1.  Hasn't it been more than six months since the
> conclusion of negotiations with VeriSign?
> 2.  Has the VeriSign "Renewal Proposal" been received
> by ICANN Staff?
> 3.  If has not been received, is VeriSign in breach of
> contract?
> 4.  If it has been received, why wasn't the public
> afforded the opportunity to review and comment upon
> the "Renewal Proposal" prior to Board action ratifying
> the contract?
> 5.  Why did the Board act to ratify VeriSign's
> proposed contract while clearly knowing (in view of
> Resolution 6.02) that the VeriSign "Renewal Proposal"
> hadn't been formally submitted?
> 6.  If the ICANN Board is now asking the .info, .biz
> and .org registries to tender their "Renewal
> Proposals" while VeriSign has been given a waiver,
> isn't that a violation of the Non-Discriminatory
> Treatment clause of the bylaws?
> 7.  Does this matter rise to the level where it
> warrants an "Independent Review of Board Actions"?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>