Re: [ga] sTLD Selection Criteria

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

How beautiful this writing is/was. When one says something a hundred different ways, every way is right or wrong and no way is right or wrong. A kingdom with too many laws is a kingdom without.
  With all the words written there are basic nomenclatura absentia. Sunset, Noncompetition, nondisclosure/confidentiality and willingness to follow the concept of tier negotiations. (nondisclosure/confidentiality, bona fides, MOU, MOA, LOCs, holdharmless, submission to jurisdiction, Corporate Curriculum Vitae, disclosure of principals) As my good friend JW always says good process makes good progress.
   
  Now keep in mind that standard operation procedures (sop) require that i and you {note the intentional reversal} require that yours and mine and hers and his be kept out of the loop of "NEGOTIANS". Such is the right of corporal privacy.
   
  e

Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  It might be helpful to review the current sTLD
selection criteria if only to examine whether
additional criteria need to be developed, or if
perhaps some of the criteria should instead be
eliminated...

here's the link:

http://www.icann.org/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/PostAppA.pdf

and if you really really want to study the sTLDs,
there's around 350+ pages of reading material at this
link: http://www.icann.org/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
  


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com