ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Conspiracies! Is VeriSign investigating members of this list?

  • To: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Conspiracies! Is VeriSign investigating members of this list?
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:49:57 -0700
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Twomey <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <20040618183514.10961.qmail@web14202.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

George and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

 It is clear that sense MDR2000 and some time before
that ICANN's than constituted board along with it's than
COB, Esther Dyson whom not by chance is heading the
ICANN approved "ALAC" along with a series of events
resulting from in part to MDR2000 that ICANN has taken
a concerted effort to disregard stakeholders/users
direct input and has held Verisign in some specific disdain
without good cause, yet made a "Deal" with Versign for
.org and .net for verisign to have exclusive right to .com.
This could be considered a conspiracy of sorts from
several points of view.  Obviously the judge in the recent
verisign suit did not see it this way however.  Hence Verisign
has to regroup and show a more convincing or compelling
case with supporting evidence.  That seems to be what they are
doing.  Can't blame them for doing so...

  Yet we have folks that seem to believe I along with
others are involved in a counter conspiracy which seems like
and effort to weaken Versign's position.  Of course those
are the same folks that have been ICANNites for some time...


George Kirikos wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I trust folks have read VeriSign's amended complaint against ICANN,
> see:
>
> http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/18/0334236&mode=nested
>
> If you scroll down to the first comment, Arnold and Porter (VeriSign's
> law firm) is even interested in me! :)
>
> Is anyone else on this list who has exercised their rights to free
> speech, as stakeholders in the DNS system as domain owners, concerned
> about being branded part of a vast secret conspiracy?
>
> Karl? Marilyn? Michael? Jeff Williams??!!?? :) Others?
>
> I'm saddened that I wasn't told about this conspiracy. :( I'd have
> supplied everyone with free pizza and Tim Horton donuts, to give energy
> to those fighting the good fight.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>