ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...

  • To: jandl@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:35:20 -0700
  • Cc: ga@xxxxxxxx, Jim Ayson <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <3F31116E.10386.8D3AE726@localhost> <3F33D682.25291.9807C5EA@localhost>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Leah and all former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,

 Our members came to your stated conclusion several years ago
now.  None the less Leah, your conclusion below is a reasonable
and wise one given ICANN's known and now well documented
history.

L. Gallegos wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2003 at 4:08, Jim Ayson wrote:
>
> > At 02:32 PM 8/6/2003 -0400, L. Gallegos wrote:
> >
> > > > 1) Who will decide of the redelegation of a ccTLD? Especially in
> > > > complicated cases like a fight between two local groups? This is not a
> > > > clerical process, it is a political one, by essence.
> > >
> > >If an existing manager is doing its job, there would be no change.  A
> > >local fight doesn't change the rules.  If a government nationalizes
> > >private industry and takes over businesses, there is little or no choice
> > >since governments may do this whether we like it or not.  At that point,
> > >the "local group" no longer exists and the government prevails.
> >
> > Interesting discussion. What if members of the local Internet community
> > believes the existing ccTLD manager is not doing a good job - and the local
> > government doesn't give a hoot about Internet issues? Where does the
> > community go to air its grievances?
>
> IANA, if the ccTLD is not functioning according to guidelines.
>
> Where would one go to air grievances against any business?    Why is a
> ccTLD different from any other business - profit or non-profit?  At what
> point would a governing agency step in?  I'm  thinking non-regulated
> industries and private vs governement entrerprises.
>
> Some ccTLDs do not allow personal registrations; some do not allow any
> private registrations; some are open to all comers.  Those decisions are
> not made by IANA, but by the managers or governments, depending on how
> those ccTLDs are held.  It should not be a simple task to unseat a ccTLD
> manager, IMO.  It should not be difficult to set up an opposing  or
> additional TLD either.  I think that is more of an issue than unseating an
> existing manager.
>
> >
> > Also in the case of the number of individuals who were appointed by Postel
> > to run ccTLDs (and there are still a number of them), what happens if one
> > of them gets hit by a bus? Who decides who the new ccTLD manager is?
> >
> Then IANA should issue a RFP for a new manager and consider only the
> guidelines in considering the replacement.
>
> Answer:  Define the IANA non-discriminatory, apolitical, technical
> guidelines, but keep it out of the hands of ICANN where ccTLDs are
> concerned.

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>