<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Crowdsoucing a performance review of the CEO
- To: Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsoucing a performance review of the CEO
- From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 01:02:08 -0300
- Cc: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XRc+B/oO8n3pPiJdlzAz5rcXgfnUJ5URewCUhKkQEPo=; b=CZeUBZid5STlxjKQl8TwNSXKXHsEvXie0KCpJSH5QVZwRuyvXKqc9XU9RXCBf56IO8 91ud9+e6AkH/Yx4VVY60/A7N20fZHQHVJT49fHR0Rgoi363h57qnTC99Ap9IfhGiTbY+ p8KX7Wls6z4yOVDVobW2pioyC7uQ1fWz5eW77qnx1SnCOxowhWYp/xlNrdS7KHpc5Ui/ +81JDSWdh43XT1c0PJ8xSJ75a/M4Z+Qf+x9Yeps5pV7J4rZ4sabTWifeHOyyZOeocVD4 03jBlPrN01eRMcOmpWUiPZcCxlUjxNn2rqpWOz96HEn+T5ts0XUz+UrEAkSAr/6UgWYA yJig==
- In-reply-to: <CAC7qwdBh4rN-YCPHKuOHrn5BLTpO+Eqe2FXOGJHybpcR5XBUAw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <201403212154.s2LLrtVl004688@pechora7.dc.icann.org> <532CF1B9.1060300@acm.org> <CAC7qwdBh4rN-YCPHKuOHrn5BLTpO+Eqe2FXOGJHybpcR5XBUAw@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I also support having this discussion.
thanks,
G.
*Gabriela Szlak *
*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak
La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.
2014-03-22 0:54 GMT-03:00 Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
>
> I support having a discussion about this, time permitting.
>
> Maria
>
>
> On 22 March 2014 10:13, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I support this.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22-Mar-14 05:53, John Berard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> As you know, I have previously suggested that the Council create the
>>> opportunity for the full community to offer input to a performance review
>>> of the CEO.
>>>
>>> Separate from what the Board is likely doing as Fadi nears his second
>>> year in office (to be marked at the London meeting if you assume a Prague
>>> meeting start or Los Angeles if Toronto is more accurate), I propose we
>>> issue a call for contributions from the community that can be forwarded to
>>> the Board.
>>>
>>> I suggest ways ask those contributions address feedback on how Fadi has
>>> done delivering on the four objectives to which he committed in Toronto:
>>>
>>> 1. Affirm the purpose of ICANN
>>>
>>> 2. Operational excellence and quality
>>>
>>> 3. Internationalizing ICANN
>>>
>>> 4. Evolve the multi a stakeholder model
>>>
>>> As he said, these four objectives led to 16 goals, 50 initiatives and
>>> 156 programs.
>>>
>>> It may be that the Council is not the perfect entity to manage the call,
>>> collection and distribution of community comment, but we are in a position
>>> to identify and work with whomever we think is best suited.
>>>
>>> In Prague, when Fadi introduced himself to the community, he said he
>>> was/"driven by building consensus," "all about inclusion," admitted he had
>>> been "reproached" for acting unilaterally in the past and wanted to "work
>>> at mutual understanding."
>>>
>>> A call for comment in review of his first two years in office can help
>>> Fadi do just that.
>>>
>>> I propose we discuss this at our open hour at noon today or during the
>>> Board prep session later in the afternoon.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Berard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|