[council] The review document referenced by Ms. Cade

[John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mar 21, 2014 9:33 PM
Subject: [Bc-excomm] Posting from a submission I made/on 360 review/after 
comments I made individually/In Dakar
To: "bc-excomm@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-excomm@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Metalitz <met@xxxxxxx>, 
Kristina Rosette <krosette@xxxxxxx>, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 

>
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345022/360 Input into CEO 
> Succession and ongoing Feedback - 
> chairs.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1321840895000&api=v2
>
>
> Dear colleagues
>
> I went back and researched earlier information on this. It was first raised 
> in Cartegena, but I can't find the transcript from what I said there.
>
> However, after my comments, as an individual, in Dakar, I was invited by the 
> Board to submit further written comments. I did share it with the other 
> Chairs, at that time, as in informal idea. 
>
> The submission I then sent is attached, and is dated Nov 13, 2011.
>
> I am not suggesting it in way is a shared view by anyone in the BC at this 
> time, and it is not exactly what John raised. 
>
> I also am of the emerging view that 360 review is needed for Board, not just 
> CEO/President.
>
> The self appraisals of Board and Chair are posted for 2010, 2011, and 2012. 
> There is no published 2013 reviews that I can find, but I am told by two 
> board members that they were completed. 
>
> I do not know about 360 review of CEO -- e.g. whether it has been done by the 
> Board, or if it is public, if it was done.   
>
> I personally think that the ideas of 360 input deserves discussion in the SGs 
> this week, but I would 'probably' be of the view that it is not a GNSO 
> Council function, but for instance, the composition I originally proposed 
> could be up to 3 participants from the Council, plus the Constituency 
> Chairs/or a designee made by the Excomms of the Constituency/SGs.
>
> This is just an idea that I wanted to remind all that I did forward, but it 
> was some time ago... 
>
> Of course, we had a different CEO at that time, but I seem to detect a 
> similar concern about how to better encourage linkage between leadership and 
> community/stakeholders on expectations and feedback. 
>
> Many of us will have participated in, whether having our teams use 360 review 
> processes, or in 360 reviews of our own executive leaders. It is not a 
> panecea. 
>
>
> In any case, I hope this is helpful.
>
> Marilyn Cade