ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO


Hi,
Interesting idea, but what makes you think anyone on the Board would care what the crowd had to say. They barely care about what the duly constituted SOs, ACs or Review Teams have to say beyond what the by-laws force them to care about.
Now, if we can get National government ministers to crowd source the review, maybe there is a chance they will pay attention. 

avri

On 20-Feb-14 22:11, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

James,
Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling
somewhere.  I figure we can do that.
Berard

    --------- Original Message ---------
    Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
    of the ICANN CEO
    From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
    To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Berard"
    <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other
    SO/ACs in an effort to provide a “360” review.
    J.
    From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
    Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35
    To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
    Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
    Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
    of the ICANN CEO
    hi John,
    i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i
    went ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP — initial
    reactions are positive.  i personally think it’s a great idea.
    mikey

    On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

        All,
        I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London,
        marks two years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's
        President and CEO.  In light of the interest driven by the
        Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I wonder if we
        should consider instigating a performance review of the
        executive using that method.
        We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report
        for the London meeting.  The standing for the Council is the
        growing executive influence over policy, looking no further than
        the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu of community-based
        working groups.
        What is your view?
        Cheers,
        Berard




    PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
    <http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
    Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>