Re: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO

[Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think it's an interesting idea - but I also see the risk for it to turn
into a free-for-all of national or interest group sections peeved at
certain Internet governance developments.

I didn't hear so many complaints from other NCPH side colleagues about
'growing executive influence over policy' during the TCMH debacle, so
colour me curious about this initiative, willing to be convinced - subject
to a fair methodology that won't be astro-turfed -  but also somewhat
skeptical of the context and motivation.

Maria


On 20 February 2014 21:11, <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> James,
>
> Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling somewhere.
> I figure we can do that.
>
> Berard
>
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the
> ICANN CEO
> From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Berard" <
> john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other SO/ACs in
> an effort to provide a "360" review.
>
> J.
>
>
> From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35
> To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of
> the ICANN CEO
>
>  hi John,
>
> i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i went
> ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP -- initial reactions
> are positive.  i personally think it's a great idea.
>
> mikey
>
>
>  On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>  All,
>
> I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London, marks two
> years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's President and CEO.  In
> light of the interest driven by the Strategy Panels in what is called crowd
> sourcing, I wonder if we should consider instigating a performance review
> of the executive using that method.
>
> We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report for the
> London meeting.  The standing for the Council is the growing executive
> influence over policy, looking no further than the rise of appointed
> strategy panels in lieu of community-based working groups.
>
> What is your view?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Berard
>
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>