<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Reporting on GAC request of ICANN on monitoring PICs
- To: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Reporting on GAC request of ICANN on monitoring PICs
- From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:49:17 -0700
- In-reply-to: <t3kw3yvn6i3qrfwob42m4sgg.1365261675861@email.android.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: MailAPI 24256
In case you missed this, here is news report coming out of the GAC meeting.
It focuses on making PICs a part of contract language, making ICANN actively
responsible for their compliance and a commitment from ICANN to not sign a new
gTLD contract until GAC advice has been given. Note this: "ICANN COO Akram
Attalah ensured: 'We will wait for GAC advice and ICANN Board reasoning and
will not sign any contract before and put us in a position to have a contract
change later.'”
Here is the link:
http://www.ip-watch.org/2013/04/06/at-icann-more-contractual-obligations-for-new-tld-operators/?utm_source=post&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts
Cheers,
Berard
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|