<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. Just back from the US.
I’ll go for B for the same reason as Jeff outlines below.
Jonathan
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: 17 May 2011 16:54
To: 'stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx'; 'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report
Unfortunately, I cannot commit on behalf of the rysg to that last sentence on
"observance" and would prefer its deletion since on our last rysg call
questions were raised and I am not sure it adds to the substance of the note.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:43 AM
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Council GNSO
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report
Thanks Tim, Jeff, Mary and Alan,
This would be the proposed message then. Either (I call this version A):
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the
other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has
not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward
with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to
provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board that it appreciates the
JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the GNSO-chartering process, in submitting
its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
Or (this my version B):
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the
other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has
not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward
with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to
provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
As Olga had requested a vote, I would like to suggest that we give ourselves
until Thursday's meeting to vote by return email to the list on either version
A or B, and whichever has the most votes is the one I send.
Is that acceptable to everyone?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 17 mai 2011 à 14:12, tim@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
No objection if you remove the last sentence. There is no chartering process
for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO could not even agree on what the charter should be.
And at least a few of us have concerns about how and why CWGs are being formed.
Tim
_____
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21 +0200
To: Council GNSO<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report
Councillors,
Please find below the NCSG's suggestion on a message which I could send to the
Chairman of the Board in my capacity as Chair of the GNSO.
Thanks Mary for providing this draft.
Please let me have your comments.
Stéphane
Le 14 mai 2011 à 16:31, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
:
Hi - sorry for the delay in getting back to you on the Council letter; there
has been some lively discussion among some NCSG folks about it.
We suggest the following draft:
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report. As the
other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council notes that it has
not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the Board's desire to move forward
with new gTLDs, including issues relating to applicant support, and hope to
provide the Board with our advice and recommendations as soon as possible.
The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board that it appreciates the
JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the chartering process, in submitting its
Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for review.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:
Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
5/14/2011 5:18 AM
Subject:
[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second
Milestone Report
Thanks Olivier.
GNSO Council, FYI.
A good weekend to all.
Stéphane
Le 14 mai 2011 à 11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :
Dear Stéphane,
please find enclosed, a copy of our follow-up message to the Board including
ALAC comments.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any query about its contents.
Have a good week-end!
Kind regards,
Olivier
-------- Message original --------
Sujet:
Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
Date :
Fri, 13 May 2011 20:26:34 -0700
De :
ICANN At-Large Staff <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pour :
Secretary <mailto:secretary@xxxxxxxxx> <secretary@xxxxxxxxx>
Copie à :
ocl@xxxxxxx <mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx> <ocl@xxxxxxx>, carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>,
rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
<rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN At-Large Staff <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear all,
The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):
* The Second Milestone Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant
Support Working Group ( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction (entitled
“Status of this Document”); and
* The Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second
Milestone Report.
We request that these documents (attached here) be forwarded to the members of
the ICANN Board.
The Second Milestone Report was received by the ALAC and the Generic Names
Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 7 May 2011. Then, the At-Large staff, on
behalf of the ALAC, initially forwarded this Report to the Board on 9 May 2011.
Please note that the Report itself has not been substantively changed since
the Board initially received it on 9 May.
During the period 7–13 May, comments on the Report were collected from the
At-Large Community. These comments are the basis for the Statement of the ALAC
on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report attached here.
The ALAC ratification process for the Second Milestone Report and the ALAC
Statement will begin on 14 May, and the results will be forwarded to the Board.
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted
independently and has not reached the approval stage.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn
Vernon
ICANN At-Large Staff
email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org
website: www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
<jas-milestone2-report-7may11-en-alac-revision.pdf><AL-ALAC-ST-0511-2 ALAC
Statement on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report - EN.pdf>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|