<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
- To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
- From: <HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:13:17 -0400
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <2CFA03BA9889274B88587EE2DF303C820208C0D118@CBIvEXMB05DC.cov.com><4DD50A79.4040105@seltzer.com> <BANLkTimE1-RMDk6_OBMMHuktEvu=oD1tUQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwWIQhHPfsmAUYwQIufGwvp0QXYXwABXw25
- Thread-topic: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
I vote for A
Debbie
Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel
American Red Cross
Office of the General Counsel
2025 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Phone: (202) 303-5356
Fax: (202) 303-0143
HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Thu 5/19/2011 8:31 AM
To: Wendy Seltzer
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report
Hi,
+ 1 for A
best
Olga
2011/5/19 Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I vote for A.
--Wendy
On 05/18/2011 11:16 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
and another one.
K
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:22 PM
To: stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx; owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint
Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
One more vote for B
Berard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the
Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report
From: Stéphane Van Gelder
Date: Tue, May 17, 2011 9:23 am
To: "Neuman, Jeff"
Cc: "'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx'" ,
"'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" ,
"'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'"
So that's one vote for version B, right?
Stéphane
Le 17 mai 2011 à 17:54, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
Unfortunately, I cannot commit on behalf of the rysg to
that last sentence on "observance" and would prefer its deletion since on our
last rysg call questions were raised and I am not sure it adds to the substance
of the note.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law& Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Stéphane Van Gelder
[mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:43 AM
To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the
Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
Thanks Tim, Jeff, Mary and Alan,
This would be the proposed message then. Either (I call
this version A):
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the
Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second
Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO
Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the
Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to
applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and
recommendations as soon as possible.
The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board
that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the GNSO-chartering
process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for
review.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO
Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
Or (this my version B):
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the
Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second
Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO
Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the
Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to
applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and
recommendations as soon as possible.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO
Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
As Olga had requested a vote, I would like to suggest
that we give ourselves until Thursday's meeting to vote by return email to the
list on either version A or B, and whichever has the most votes is the one I
send.
Is that acceptable to everyone?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 17 mai 2011 à 14:12, tim@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
No objection if you remove the last sentence. There is
no chartering process for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO could not even agree on what
the charter should be. And at least a few of us have concerns about how and why
CWGs are being formed.
Tim
From: Stéphane Van Gelder
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21 +0200
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the
Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
Councillors,
Please find below the NCSG's suggestion on a message
which I could send to the Chairman of the Board in my capacity as Chair of the
GNSO.
Thanks Mary for providing this draft.
Please let me have your comments.
Stéphane
Le 14 mai 2011 à 16:31, a écrit :
Hi - sorry for the delay in getting back to you on the
Council letter; there has been some lively discussion among some NCSG folks
about it.
We suggest the following draft:
Dear Peter,
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the
Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second
Milestone Report. As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO
Council notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the
Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating to
applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and
recommendations as soon as possible.
The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board
that it appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the chartering
process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO for
review.
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO
Council's message to the Board.
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science
Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>>
From:
Stéphane Van Gelder
To:
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond , Council GNSO
Date:
5/14/2011 5:18 AM
Subject:
[council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint
Applicant Support Second Milestone ReportThanks Olivier.
GNSO Council, FYI.
A good weekend to all.
Stéphane
Le 14 mai 2011 à 11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a
écrit :
Dear Stéphane,
please find enclosed, a copy of our follow-up message
to the Board including ALAC comments.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any
query about its contents.
Have a good week-end!
Kind regards,
Olivier
-------- Message original --------
Sujet:
Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support
Second Milestone Report
Date :
Fri, 13 May 2011 20:26:34 -0700
De :
ICANN At-Large Staff
Pour :
Secretary
Copie à :
ocl@xxxxxxx , carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx ,
rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx , ICANN At-Large Staff
Dear all,
The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to
you, on behalf of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):
The Second Milestone Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction
(entitled ?Status of this Document?); and
The Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report.
We request that these documents (attached here) be
forwarded to the members of the ICANN Board.
The Second Milestone Report was received by the ALAC
and the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 7 May 2011. Then, the
At-Large staff, on behalf of the ALAC, initially forwarded this Report to the
Board on 9 May 2011. Please note that the Report itself has not been
substantively changed since the Board initially received it on 9 May.
During the period 7?13 May, comments on the Report were
collected from the At-Large Community. These comments are the basis for the
Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
attached here.
The ALAC ratification process for the Second Milestone
Report and the ALAC Statement will begin on 14 May, and the results will be
forwarded to the Board.
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is
being conducted independently and has not reached the approval stage.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella
Gruber-White, and Marilyn Vernon
ICANN At-Large Staff
email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org
<http://atlarge.icann.org/>
website: www.atlarge.icann.org
<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 914-374-0613
Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|