[council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Here's is Peter's reponse to Kristina's question.
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: Peter Dengate Thrush [mailto:peter.dengatethrush@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:17 PM
To: Janis Karklins
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'Marco Lorenzoni'; "'Stéphane Van Gelder'"; 'Cavalli, Olga'
Subject: Re: AoC A&T Review Teams


Chuck 
endorsing what Janis has said; seems strange that the Board Chair and the GAC 
can, but the SO and other AC chairs cant...

I think its a question for each SO to determine, observing usual conflict of 
interest rules and the common sense which you and others bring to making these 
things work.

regards

Peter 



On 19/02/2010, at 11:20 AM, Janis Karklins wrote:


        
        Chuck
        I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs 
should abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs.
        There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be 
candidates. Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex 
officio.
        In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously 
considering to nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course, 
subject of sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.
        Best regards
        JK
        
        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
        To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
        Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
        Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams
        Peter/Janis,
        The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today 
regarding your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members:  Is there any 
anticipation that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be 
eliminated from consideration for the RT?  I stated that I was unaware of any 
restrictions like this, but said I would ask the two of you.
        For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in 
the GNSO. 
        BTW, thanks for the extension of time.
        Chuck Gomes