ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams


That should have said "response" not "request".
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:28 PM
        To: Council GNSO
        Subject: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
        
        
        Note the request from Janis regarding Kristina's question in today's 
Council meeting.
         
        Chuck

________________________________

        From: Janis Karklins [mailto:janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:20 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Peter Dengate-Thrush'
        Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; 'Cavalli, Olga'
        Subject: RE: AoC A&T Review Teams
        
        

        Chuck

        I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs 
should abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs. 

        There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be 
candidates. Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex 
officio. 

        In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously 
considering to nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course, 
subject of sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.

        Best regards

        JK

         

        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
        To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
        Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
        Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams

         

        Peter/Janis,

         

        The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today 
regarding your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members:  Is there any 
anticipation that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be 
eliminated from consideration for the RT?  I stated that I was unaware of any 
restrictions like this, but said I would ask the two of you.

         

        For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in 
the GNSO. 

         

        BTW, thanks for the extension of time.

         

        Chuck Gomes 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>