RE: [council] FW: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suggest that we avoid talking about slipping dates until we get
further into the work and until we do our prioritization exercise, which
I plan to initiate in our follow-up meeting tomorrow afternoon.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
        Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:12 PM
        To: GNSO Council
        Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested -
PDP-WT face to face meeting
        
        

        Posting Jeff's clarification below.  Though also would note that
the STI timeframe could slip, and remind that we have several other
ongoing initiatives that would benefit greatly from additional face to
fact meetings.

         

        -Mike

         

        From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
        Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:00 PM
        To: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Marika Konings;
Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx; GNSO Council
        Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to
face meeting

         

        Just for clarification (and please post to the Council list),
the Work Team meeting is not being planned until all of the deadlines on
the STI work are to have expired.

        
        Thanks.

         

        Jeffrey J. Neuman 
        Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

        
________________________________


        The information contained in this e-mail message is intended
only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

         

         

        From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
        Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:07 AM
        To: 'Marika Konings'; 'Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx'; GNSO Council
        Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to
face meeting

         

        I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all
the various work before us, immediately.  In my view, this Work Team
meeting should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger
priority for a face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in
particular the STI response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting
team, etc.

         

        Mike Rodenbaugh

        RODENBAUGH LAW

        548 Market Street

        San Francisco, CA  94104

        (415) 738-8087
<http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&ref
erer=http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> 

        http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> 

        From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
        Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM
        To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to
face meeting

         

        Dear All,
        
        As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal
for a face to face meeting forward, I'll be developing a workplan
outlining the objectives and expected deliverables of such a meeting in
order to obtain internal approval. As discussed, the idea would be to
provide travel funding for one active WT representative from each
constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO. Remote participation will be
arranged for those that will not be able to attend in person. To move
this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request the
following information:

        1.      In order to determine the most appropriate and
cost-effective meeting venue and have an indication of the number of
participants that will require funding, could you please send me the
name of the proposed funded representative from your constituency /
stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the location from where this person will be
travelling 
        2.      Please complete the following doodle (see
http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g) so we can try to find a meeting
date that is most convenient to all. Please note that the idea is to
have a 1,5 - 2 day meeting. 

        
        Please let me know if you have any further questions.
        
        Best regards,
        
        Marika