RE: [council] ACSO meeting

["Terry L Davis, P.E." <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri

 

Likewise.

 

Take care

Terry

 

  _____  

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 6:06 AM
To: avri@xxxxxxx
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] ACSO meeting

 

Thanks Avri,
Both alternatives are ok with me.
I volunteer to participate.
Regards
Olga

2009/2/13 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>



Hi,

Hi,

As a NCA, you do not belong to a Stakeholder group as defined in the
GNSO, though in time you will probably6 belong to one of the two
chambers.

I think there are two alternatives:

- either one of the stakeholder groups could take your interest into
account and consider you as one of the participants.

- or if you or others object to this being handled in the proto-SGs, we
can we decide to bring it in the whole council for a council wide
decision of the participants.


a.



On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 11:33 -0200, Olga Cavalli wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not sure to which proto-SG I belong or if I do belong to a
> proto-SG.
> I would be interested in participating.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2009/2/13 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
>         Hi,
>
>         The enclosed memo covers the resolution we came to on this
>         meetings ACSO
>         experiment.  I am available to answer any question anyone
>         might have.  I
>         hope you find that the topics bear a strong resemblance to
>         some of our
>         suggestions.
>
>         The next task is to pick the participants from the GNSO.  A
>         couple
>         boundary conditions:
>
>         -  Every ACSO gets 3 maybe 4 participants at the table.  I
>         mentioned
>         that because of the restructuring we were doing into SGs, that
>         I thought
>         we could do with 4 but did not believe we could do with fewer
>         then 4.
>         The SSAC chair was kind enough to allow us one of theirs, if
>         needed, to
>         make sure we had 4.  There will be a maximum of 20 people at
>         the table.
>
>         - We have decided that chairs would NOT be at the table.
>
>         - We can seat different people for each of the sessions.
>          Though we can
>         also seat the same person for both if we choose.
>
>         At this point, unless there is objection, I suggest that each
>         proto-SG
>         pick its participants and let the list know so that I can pull
>         the list
>         together.  Please do this as soon as it is practical and
>         please pass
>         this message on to those who are responsible for setting up
>         the SGs.
>
>         Thanks
>
>         a.
>
>
>
>